State v. Williams

131 S.W.3d 847, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 507, 2004 WL 728098
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 2313
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 6, 2004·No. No. ED 83202·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Williams (“Defendant”) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis entered after a jury found him guilty of one count of trafficking drugs in the second degree. Defendant contends that the trial court erred when it refused to give Defendant’s proposed instruction A, submitting the lesser included offense of possession of a controlled substance.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude that the trial court did not err in refusing to submit a lesser included instruction for possession of a controlled substance. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Williams, 131 S.W.3d 847, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 507, 2004 WL 728098 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

131 S.W.3d 847 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.