State v. Williams

165 S.W.3d 197, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 913, 2005 WL 1431911
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1729
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 21, 2005·No. No. ED 84586·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sandy Williams (“defendant”) appeals the judgment of his conviction of one count of forcible rape, three counts of forcible sodomy, one count of burglary in the first degree, and one count of resisting arrest. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in allowing testimony from Officer Mark Kennedy regarding defendant’s photograph.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Williams, 165 S.W.3d 197, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 913, 2005 WL 1431911 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

165 S.W.3d 197 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.