State v. Washington

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Washington. Read the opinion of the Court — 424 S.C. 374
Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided February 10, 2021·No. 2019-000859·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jamaa Ato Washington, Jr, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-000859

Appeal From Charleston County R. Scott Sprouse, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-042 Submitted January 1, 2021 – Filed February 10, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Sarah Elizabeth Shipe, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Washington, (S.C. Ct. App. 2021).

State v. Washington (State v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)