State v. Washington

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Washington. Read the opinion of the Court — 424 S.C. 374
Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided June 13, 2018·No. 2018-UP-241·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Carrol Tremayne Washington, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-000792

Appeal From Newberry County Donald B. Hocker, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-241 Submitted April 1, 2018 – Filed June 13, 2018

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and HILL, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Washington, (S.C. Ct. App. 2018).

State v. Washington (State v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)