State v. Washington

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Washington

DecidedJune 13, 2018

Docket2018-UP-241

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Washington (State v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Washington, (S.C. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Carrol Tremayne Washington, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-000792

Appeal From Newberry County Donald B. Hocker, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-241 Submitted April 1, 2018 – Filed June 13, 2018

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and HILL, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI