State v. Jackson
This text of State v. Jackson (State v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent
v.
Charles Jackson, Appellant
Appeal from Aiken County
Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-012
Submitted January 2, 2009 Filed January 8, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Charles Jackson appeals his conviction and sentence for second-degree burglary (violent). He argues the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict where there was insufficient evidence of guilt. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Jacksons appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Huff, Thomas, and Lockemy, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jackson-scctapp-2009.