State v. Washington

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Washington. Read the opinion of the Court — 424 S.C. 374
Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided March 2, 2016·No. 2016-UP-101·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Mack Washington, Jr., Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2014-000667

Appeal From Colleton County Perry M. Buckner, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-101 Submitted November 1, 2015 – Filed March 2, 2016

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Tiffany Lorraine Butler, of Columbia; and Mack Washington, Jr., pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Interim Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted. APPEAL DISMISSED. 1

HUFF, A.C.J., and WILLIAMS and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Washington, (S.C. Ct. App. 2016).

State v. Washington (State v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)