State v. Washington

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Donnel Lamont Washington, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-001043

Appeal From Georgetown County Larry B. Hyman, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-346 Submitted September 1, 2021 – Filed October 6, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, and Donnel Lamont Washington, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.1

KONDUROS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.