State v. Thompson

436 S.W.3d 221, 2013 WL 1209096, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 363
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 677
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 26, 2013·No. No. ED 98217·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dejuan Thompson (Thompson) appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of one count of distribution of a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.211. In his sole point on appeal, Thompson contends the trial court abused its discretion in overruling his objection and allowing Sergeant Heath to present testimony of uncharged crimes. We find no error and affirm.

An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment of the motion court pursuant to Rule 30.25(b) Mo. R.Crim. P. (2012).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Thompson, 436 S.W.3d 221, 2013 WL 1209096, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 363 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

436 S.W.3d 221 (State v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.