State v. Thompson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Thompson

436 S.W.3d 221, 2013 WL 1209096, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 363

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 26, 2013

DocketNo. ED 98217

StatusPublished

This text of 436 S.W.3d 221 (State v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Thompson, 436 S.W.3d 221, 2013 WL 1209096, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 363 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dejuan Thompson (Thompson) appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of one count of distribution of a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.211. In his sole point on appeal, Thompson contends the trial court abused its discretion in overruling his objection and allowing Sergeant Heath to present testimony of uncharged crimes. We find no error and affirm.

An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment of the motion court pursuant to Rule 30.25(b) Mo. R.Crim. P. (2012).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dejuan Thompson (Thompson) appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of one count of distribution of a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.211. In his sole point on appeal, Thompson contends the trial court abused its discretion in overruling his objection and allowing Sergeant Heath to present testimony of uncharged crimes. We find no error and affirm.

An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment of the motion court pursuant to Rule 30.25(b) Mo. R.Crim. P. (2012).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

436 S.W.3d 221, 2013 WL 1209096, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thompson-moctapp-2013.