State v. Thompson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Thompson

330 S.W.3d 869, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 116, 2011 WL 397637

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 8, 2011

DocketED 93899

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 330 S.W.3d 869 (State v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Thompson, 330 S.W.3d 869, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 116, 2011 WL 397637 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Foster Thompson appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury found him guilty of forcible rape and incest. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. ,

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Foster Thompson appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury found him guilty of forcible rape and incest. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. ,

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

330 S.W.3d 869, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 116, 2011 WL 397637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thompson-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack