State v. Thompson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Thompson

460 S.W.3d 929, 2015 WL 2226326

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 759 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 12, 2015·No. WD 76615·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam

Armón Thompson appeals his convictions for second-degree murder and armed criminal action. Thompson challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions and the court’s ruling that precluded him from cross-examining a detective about a pending federal investigation against the detective. After a thorough review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of convictions. A formal, published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam

Armón Thompson appeals his convictions for second-degree murder and armed criminal action. Thompson challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions and the court’s ruling that precluded him from cross-examining a detective about a pending federal investigation against the detective. After a thorough review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of convictions. A formal, published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Thompson, 460 S.W.3d 929, 2015 WL 2226326 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

460 S.W.3d 929 (State v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.