State v. Spencer
139 S.W.3d 605, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 823, 2004 WL 1243984
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant, Frederick Spencer, appeals pro se from the order denying his motion seeking entry of a nunc pro tunc order. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Spencer, 139 S.W.3d 605, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 823, 2004 WL 1243984 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).
139 S.W.3d 605 (State v. Spencer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Spencer
569 S.W.3d 477 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2018)
Spencer v. State
255 S.W.3d 527 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)