Witt v. Witt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Witt v. Witt

139 S.W.3d 605, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 793, 2004 WL 1196130

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 1, 2004

DocketED 81200, ED 81342

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 139 S.W.3d 605 (Witt v. Witt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Witt v. Witt, 139 S.W.3d 605, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 793, 2004 WL 1196130 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Both parties appeal from a judgment entered on the parties’ cross motions to modify a dissolution decree. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI