State v. Spencer

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Spencer

139 S.W.3d 604, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 692, 2004 WL 1049057

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 11, 2004

DocketED 83578

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 139 S.W.3d 604 (State v. Spencer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Spencer, 139 S.W.3d 604, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 692, 2004 WL 1049057 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Frederick Spencer appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion to vacate its order denying his request, filed pursuant to Section 550.040 RSMo 1994, for the taxing of costs in his favor. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears.

An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI