State v. Spencer

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Spencer

83 S.W.3d 698, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1810, 2002 WL 2002176

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Spencer. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 877 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 3, 2002·No. No. WD 60936·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Randy G. Spencer appeals from the judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Pettis County related to his “Petition for the Return of Siezed (sic) Property.” After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, that no [699]*699error of law appears, and that an opinion would have no precedential value.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Randy G. Spencer appeals from the judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Pettis County related to his “Petition for the Return of Siezed (sic) Property.” After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, that no [699]*699error of law appears, and that an opinion would have no precedential value.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Spencer, 83 S.W.3d 698, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1810, 2002 WL 2002176 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

83 S.W.3d 698 (State v. Spencer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.