State v. Smith

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Smith

576 S.W.3d 337

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 862 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 11, 2019·No. No. ED 106499·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Adonnis Smith appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for murder in the first degree and armed criminal action. There was no error in the admission of the child eyewitness's out of court statements and no error *338in failing to sua sponte intervene in the prosecutor's closing argument. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Adonnis Smith appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for murder in the first degree and armed criminal action. There was no error in the admission of the child eyewitness's out of court statements and no error *338in failing to sua sponte intervene in the prosecutor's closing argument. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Smith, 576 S.W.3d 337 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

576 S.W.3d 337 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.