State v. Smith

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Smith

576 S.W.3d 337

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 11, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106499

StatusPublished

This text of 576 S.W.3d 337 (State v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Smith, 576 S.W.3d 337 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Adonnis Smith appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for murder in the first degree and armed criminal action. There was no error in the admission of the child eyewitness's out of court statements and no error *338in failing to sua sponte intervene in the prosecutor's closing argument. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Adonnis Smith appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for murder in the first degree and armed criminal action. There was no error in the admission of the child eyewitness's out of court statements and no error *338in failing to sua sponte intervene in the prosecutor's closing argument. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

576 S.W.3d 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-smith-moctapp-2019.