State v. Smith

510 S.W.3d 364, 2017 WL 490445, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 111
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 7, 2017·No. No. ED 104014·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Marcell Smith appeals his convictions by a St. Louis County jury of one count of first-degree robbery, one count of second-degree assault, and two counts of armed criminal action arising out of the robbery and shooting of Roosevelt Phillips, Jr. (“Victim”). Smith raises two points on appeal: 1) that the trial court abused its discretion in sustaining the State’s objection to Smith calling Victim’s wife to testify at trial; and 2) that the trial court plainly eiTed in failing to sua sponte intervene during the State’s cross-examination of Tiffany Lindewirth. Finding no error, we affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smith, 510 S.W.3d 364, 2017 WL 490445, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 111 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

510 S.W.3d 364 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marcell Smith v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2025