State v. Smith

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Smith

435 S.W.3d 673, 2014 WL 929050, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 256

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 11, 2014

DocketNo. WD 75922

StatusPublished

This text of 435 S.W.3d 673 (State v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Smith, 435 S.W.3d 673, 2014 WL 929050, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 256 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Smith appeals from his convictions of one count of attempted manufacture of methamphetamine, § 195.211, and one count of tampering with physical evidence, § 575.100. Having reviewed the record and considered the arguments advanced on appeal, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Smith appeals from his convictions of one count of attempted manufacture of methamphetamine, § 195.211, and one count of tampering with physical evidence, § 575.100. Having reviewed the record and considered the arguments advanced on appeal, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

435 S.W.3d 673, 2014 WL 929050, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-smith-moctapp-2014.