State v. Smith

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Smith

493 S.W.3d 33, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 615, 2016 WL 3661850

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 21, 2016

DocketED 103132

StatusPublished

This text of 493 S.W.3d 33 (State v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Smith, 493 S.W.3d 33, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 615, 2016 WL 3661850 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Q. Smith appeals the judgment entered upon his convictions for first-degree assault and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2016).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Q. Smith appeals the judgment entered upon his convictions for first-degree assault and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2016).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

493 S.W.3d 33, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 615, 2016 WL 3661850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-smith-moctapp-2016.