State v. Santiago

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Santiago

608 A.2d 686, 221 Conn. 920, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 126

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedApril 3, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 608 A.2d 686 (State v. Santiago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Santiago, 608 A.2d 686, 221 Conn. 920, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 126 (Colo. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 26 Conn. App. 481, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in not ruling that a defendant standing in the doorway of his home is in a public place, and may be arrested without a warrant?

“2. Was the Appellate Court correct in holding that a porch is part of the home, and is subject to fourth amendment protections?

“3. Was the Appellate Court incorrect in reversing the trial court’s factual finding that the defendant was in his doorway and instead engaged in fact finding to determine that the defendant was on a porch which was an extension of his home?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 26 Conn. App. 481, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in not ruling that a defendant standing in the doorway of his home is in a public place, and may be arrested without a warrant?

“2. Was the Appellate Court correct in holding that a porch is part of the home, and is subject to fourth amendment protections?

“3. Was the Appellate Court incorrect in reversing the trial court’s factual finding that the defendant was in his doorway and instead engaged in fact finding to determine that the defendant was on a porch which was an extension of his home?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

608 A.2d 686, 221 Conn. 920, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-santiago-conn-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack