State v. Santiago

608 A.2d 686, 221 Conn. 920, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 126
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided April 3, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 26 Conn. App. 481, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in not ruling that a defendant standing in the doorway of his home is in a public place, and may be arrested without a warrant?

“2. Was the Appellate Court correct in holding that a porch is part of the home, and is subject to fourth amendment protections?

“3. Was the Appellate Court incorrect in reversing the trial court’s factual finding that the defendant was in his doorway and instead engaged in fact finding to determine that the defendant was on a porch which was an extension of his home?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Santiago, 608 A.2d 686, 221 Conn. 920, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 126 (Colo. 1992).

608 A.2d 686 (State v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Santiago
619 A.2d 1132 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1993)