State v. Santiago

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Santiago

581 A.2d 1057, 216 Conn. 820, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 374

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 4, 1990·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 22 Conn. App. 683, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“May the defendant belatedly raise the constitutionality of General Statutes § 53a-167b? Is the statute constitutional?”

Denise Berza, special public defender, in support of the petition. Jack W. Fischer, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 4, 1990

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 22 Conn. App. 683, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“May the defendant belatedly raise the constitutionality of General Statutes § 53a-167b? Is the statute constitutional?”

Denise Berza, special public defender, in support of the petition. Jack W. Fischer, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 4, 1990

State v. Santiago, 581 A.2d 1057, 216 Conn. 820, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 374 (Colo. 1990).

Pincite

581 A.2d 1057 (State v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related