State v. Clark

795 A.2d 546, 260 Conn. 906, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 141
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 28, 2002
DocketSC 16713
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 795 A.2d 546 (State v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Clark, 795 A.2d 546, 260 Conn. 906, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 141 (Colo. 2002).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 68 Conn. App. 19 (AC 18775), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[907]*907The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16713. Sheila A. Huddleston and Karen T. Staib, special public defenders, in support of the petition. Lisa A. Riggione, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided March 28, 2002

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant had failed to establish a constitutional violation in the trial court’s instructions on the law of self-defense?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Clark
826 A.2d 128 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2003)
State v. Cruz
816 A.2d 683 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
795 A.2d 546, 260 Conn. 906, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-clark-conn-2002.