State v. Robinson

970 S.W.2d 840, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 879, 1998 WL 234182
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 12, 1998·No. No. 71433·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury for first-degree assault and armed criminal action. On appeal, Defendant claims the trial court erred in refusing his tendered instruction on assault in the second degree, overruling his objection to the prosecutor’s misstatement of the evidence during closing argument and allowing a tape of a 911 call to be played for the jury. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum opinion, for their use only, explaining our reasons for affirming the judgment. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Robinson, 970 S.W.2d 840, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 879, 1998 WL 234182 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

970 S.W.2d 840 (State v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. State
34 S.W.3d 208 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000)