State v. Robinson

931 S.W.2d 908, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1574
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Robinson. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 2138
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 17, 1996·No. Nos. 66861, 69178·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of one count of manufacture of a controlled substance, § 195.211, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to a term of ten years’ imprisonment as a prior and persistent offender. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Robinson, 931 S.W.2d 908, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1574 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

931 S.W.2d 908 (State v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.