State v. Robinson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Robinson

972 S.W.2d 348, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 707, 1998 WL 169791

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 14, 1998

DocketNo. 72078

StatusPublished

This text of 972 S.W.2d 348 (State v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Robinson, 972 S.W.2d 348, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 707, 1998 WL 169791 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, John Robinson, appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered on his convictions of one count of second degree murder, section 565.021 RSMo. (1994), seven counts of first degree assault, section 565.050, and eight counts of armed criminal [349]*349action, section 571.015. The trial court sentenced defendant to ten years imprisonment for the second degree murder count and each of the first degree assault counts and three years imprisonment for each of the armed criminal action counts. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, John Robinson, appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered on his convictions of one count of second degree murder, section 565.021 RSMo. (1994), seven counts of first degree assault, section 565.050, and eight counts of armed criminal [349]*349action, section 571.015. The trial court sentenced defendant to ten years imprisonment for the second degree murder count and each of the first degree assault counts and three years imprisonment for each of the armed criminal action counts. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

972 S.W.2d 348, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 707, 1998 WL 169791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-robinson-moctapp-1998.