Robinson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Robinson v. State

14 S.W.3d 643, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 362, 2000 WL 271971

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1568 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 14, 2000·No. No. ED 76529·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying a Rule 29.15 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

[644]*644The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying a Rule 29.15 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

[644]*644The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Robinson v. State, 14 S.W.3d 643, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 362, 2000 WL 271971 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

14 S.W.3d 643 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.