State v. King
This text of 435 So. 2d 370 (State v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Jerry Boyce KING, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
*371 Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Katherine V. Blanco, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.
Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and Douglas S. Connor, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The state has appealed from an order granting the appellee's motion to dismiss the amended information filed against him on the ground that section 817.563, Florida Statutes (1981), is unconstitutional. We reverse on the authority of our recent decision in M.P. v. State, 430 So.2d 523 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), wherein we held that section 817.563 is constitutional.
REVERSED.
OTT, C.J., and DANAHY and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
435 So. 2d 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-king-fladistctapp-1983.