Agramonte v. Aviles

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Agramonte v. Aviles

435 So. 2d 370, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21744

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 27, 1983·No. No. 83-686·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, George Michael Agramonte, has filed an interlocutory appeal from an order granting a motion for partial summary judgment in favor of appellee, Irene Aviles. We conclude that we are without jurisdiction to entertain this appeal and, therefore, we dismiss it.

The order under review is not an appeala-ble non-final order under Fla.R.App.P. 9.130. Moreover, we have determined that this appeal should not be treated as a petition for a writ of certiorari under Fla.R. App.P. 9.040(c) and 9.100, as the appellant has an adequate remedy by plenary appeal when the trial court enters a final judgment.

Appeal dismissed.

BERANEK, GLICKSTEIN and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, George Michael Agramonte, has filed an interlocutory appeal from an order granting a motion for partial summary judgment in favor of appellee, Irene Aviles. We conclude that we are without jurisdiction to entertain this appeal and, therefore, we dismiss it.

The order under review is not an appeala-ble non-final order under Fla.R.App.P. 9.130. Moreover, we have determined that this appeal should not be treated as a petition for a writ of certiorari under Fla.R. App.P. 9.040(c) and 9.100, as the appellant has an adequate remedy by plenary appeal when the trial court enters a final judgment.

Appeal dismissed.

BERANEK, GLICKSTEIN and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Agramonte v. Aviles, 435 So. 2d 370, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21744 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

435 So. 2d 370 (Agramonte v. Aviles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related