State v. Growden
This text of 437 So. 2d 783 (State v. Growden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Teresa R. GROWDEN a/k/a Cheryl Lynn Powell, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.
Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and Robert F. Moeller, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellee.
*784 PER CURIAM.
The state has appealed from an order granting the appellee's motion to dismiss an information on the ground that section 817.563, Florida Statutes (1981), is unconstitutional. We reverse on the authority of our recent decision in M.P. v. State, 430 So.2d 523 (Fla.2d DCA 1983), wherein we held that section 817.563 is constitutional. See also State v. King, 435 So.2d 370 (Fla.2d DCA 1983).
REVERSED.
HOBSON, A.C.J., and DANAHY and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
437 So. 2d 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-growden-fladistctapp-1983.