Growden v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Growden v. State

463 So. 2d 1145, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 114, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3255

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedFebruary 7, 1985

DocketNo. 64407

StatusPublished

This text of 463 So. 2d 1145 (Growden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Growden v. State, 463 So. 2d 1145, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 114, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3255 (Fla. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

BOYD, Chief Justice.

This cause is before the Court on petition for review of the decision of the district court of appeal in State v. Growden, 437 So.2d 783 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). The district court, in deciding the state’s appeal from an order dismissing a criminal charge, held a state statute valid against a constitutional challenge, thus giving this Court jurisdiction to review the decision. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We approve the decision of the district court of appeal.

The question presented is whether section 817.563, Florida Statutes (1981), is constitutional. The statute makes it unlawful to agree, consent, or offer to sell a controlled substance and then in lieu thereof to sell a substance other than a controlled substance. The statute is assailed on both substantive and procedural due process grounds. It is argued that the statute fails to contain a required intent element; that it is vague; that it improperly burdens the defendant with proving his innocence, and that it bears no reasonable relationship to a legitimate state objective.

We reject all of these arguments and declare section 817.563 to be constitutional. [1146]*1146See State v. Bussey, 463 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 1985).

The decision of the district court of appeal is approved.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BOYD, Chief Justice.

This cause is before the Court on petition for review of the decision of the district court of appeal in State v. Growden, 437 So.2d 783 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). The district court, in deciding the state’s appeal from an order dismissing a criminal charge, held a state statute valid against a constitutional challenge, thus giving this Court jurisdiction to review the decision. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We approve the decision of the district court of appeal.

The question presented is whether section 817.563, Florida Statutes (1981), is constitutional. The statute makes it unlawful to agree, consent, or offer to sell a controlled substance and then in lieu thereof to sell a substance other than a controlled substance. The statute is assailed on both substantive and procedural due process grounds. It is argued that the statute fails to contain a required intent element; that it is vague; that it improperly burdens the defendant with proving his innocence, and that it bears no reasonable relationship to a legitimate state objective.

We reject all of these arguments and declare section 817.563 to be constitutional. [1146]*1146See State v. Bussey, 463 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 1985).

The decision of the district court of appeal is approved.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

463 So. 2d 1145, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 114, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/growden-v-state-fla-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack