Houser v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Houser v. State

453 So. 2d 484, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14142

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 27, 1984

DocketNo. 84-199

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 453 So. 2d 484 (Houser v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Houser v. State, 453 So. 2d 484, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14142 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from conviction of two counts of agreeing to sell a controlled substance and then selling another substance in lieu of such controlled substance, contrary to section 817.563, Florida Statutes (1983).

We reject defendant’s contention that the substantive portions of the statute are unconstitutional. State v. Growden, 437 So.2d 783 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); State v. King, 435 So.2d 370 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); M.P. v. State, 430 So.2d 523 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); State v. Thomas, 428 So.2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA), petition for review denied, 436 So.2d 101 (Fla.1983). In upholding the constitutionality of the statute, we recognize our decision directly conflicts with State v. Bussey, 444 So.2d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

We also reject defendant’s claim that the penalty provisions of the statute are unconstitutional.

AFFIRMED.

RYDER, C.J., and OTT and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from conviction of two counts of agreeing to sell a controlled substance and then selling another substance in lieu of such controlled substance, contrary to section 817.563, Florida Statutes (1983).

We reject defendant’s contention that the substantive portions of the statute are unconstitutional. State v. Growden, 437 So.2d 783 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); State v. King, 435 So.2d 370 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); M.P. v. State, 430 So.2d 523 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); State v. Thomas, 428 So.2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA), petition for review denied, 436 So.2d 101 (Fla.1983). In upholding the constitutionality of the statute, we recognize our decision directly conflicts with State v. Bussey, 444 So.2d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

We also reject defendant’s claim that the penalty provisions of the statute are unconstitutional.

AFFIRMED.

RYDER, C.J., and OTT and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

453 So. 2d 484, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houser-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack