Houser v. State

453 So. 2d 484, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14142
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 27, 1984·No. No. 84-199·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from conviction of two counts of agreeing to sell a controlled substance and then selling another substance in lieu of such controlled substance, contrary to section 817.563, Florida Statutes (1983).

We reject defendant’s contention that the substantive portions of the statute are unconstitutional. State v. Growden, 437 So.2d 783 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); State v. King, 435 So.2d 370 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); M.P. v. State, 430 So.2d 523 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); State v. Thomas, 428 So.2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA), petition for review denied, 436 So.2d 101 (Fla.1983). In upholding the constitutionality of the statute, we recognize our decision directly conflicts with State v. Bussey, 444 So.2d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

We also reject defendant’s claim that the penalty provisions of the statute are unconstitutional.

AFFIRMED.

RYDER, C.J., and OTT and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Houser v. State, 453 So. 2d 484, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14142 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

453 So. 2d 484 (Houser v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Houser v. State
477 So. 2d 548 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Brown v. State
456 So. 2d 1335 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Lindsey v. State
453 So. 2d 485 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)