State v. Jones

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Jones

256 S.W.3d 209, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 891, 2008 WL 2572106

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 1, 2008·No. WD 67175·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Johnny Jones (“Jones”) appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, of first degree robbery and armed criminal action. Jones complains that the trial court erred in denying a continuance for the purpose of obtaining psychological records bearing on the voluntariness of a confession he gave to the police following the robbery in question. Jones has failed to establish, however, that the trial court action of which he complains resulted in any prejudice. As a formal published opinion would have no precedential value, the parties have been provided with a memorandum explaining the reasoning of the court, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Johnny Jones (“Jones”) appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, of first degree robbery and armed criminal action. Jones complains that the trial court erred in denying a continuance for the purpose of obtaining psychological records bearing on the voluntariness of a confession he gave to the police following the robbery in question. Jones has failed to establish, however, that the trial court action of which he complains resulted in any prejudice. As a formal published opinion would have no precedential value, the parties have been provided with a memorandum explaining the reasoning of the court, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Jones, 256 S.W.3d 209, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 891, 2008 WL 2572106 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

256 S.W.3d 209 (State v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related