State v. Jones

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Jones

155 S.W.3d 792, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 120, 2005 WL 147413

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 25, 2005

DocketED 84073

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 155 S.W.3d 792 (State v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Jones, 155 S.W.3d 792, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 120, 2005 WL 147413 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darnell Jones (“Defendant”) appeals the judgment and sentence entered upon his conviction of assault in the first degree, forcible sodomy, and felonious restraint following a non-jury trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darnell Jones (“Defendant”) appeals the judgment and sentence entered upon his conviction of assault in the first degree, forcible sodomy, and felonious restraint following a non-jury trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 S.W.3d 792, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 120, 2005 WL 147413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jones-moctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack