State v. Jones
292 S.W.3d 615, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1376, 2009 WL 3075600
Opinion
ORDER
Jay Derico Jones appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a search incident to his arrest. On appeal, Jones claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion because the evidence was discovered as the result of an unlawful seizure. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Jones, 292 S.W.3d 615, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1376, 2009 WL 3075600 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
292 S.W.3d 615 (State v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Heyer v. Missouri State Highway Patrol
292 S.W.3d 615 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)