Heyer v. Missouri State Highway Patrol

Missouri Court of Appeals

Heyer v. Missouri State Highway Patrol

292 S.W.3d 615, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1379, 2009 WL 3075346

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 29, 2009·No. WD 70544·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

John Heyer appeals the circuit court’s dismissal of his First Amended Petition for Declaratory Judgment and Permanent Injunction. Heyer’s petition alleged that Missouri authorities had erroneously required him to register as a sex offender under what is now § 589.400.1(7), RSMo Cum.Supp.2008, based on his convictions of one count of Sexual Abuse and two counts of Public Sexual Indecency in the Superior Court of Maricopa County, Arizona. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

John Heyer appeals the circuit court’s dismissal of his First Amended Petition for Declaratory Judgment and Permanent Injunction. Heyer’s petition alleged that Missouri authorities had erroneously required him to register as a sex offender under what is now § 589.400.1(7), RSMo Cum.Supp.2008, based on his convictions of one count of Sexual Abuse and two counts of Public Sexual Indecency in the Superior Court of Maricopa County, Arizona. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Heyer v. Missouri State Highway Patrol, 292 S.W.3d 615, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1379, 2009 WL 3075346 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

292 S.W.3d 615 (Heyer v. Missouri State Highway Patrol) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related