Stewart v. State

256 S.W.3d 209, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 894, 2008 WL 2572541
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 1, 2008
DocketWD 68021
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 256 S.W.3d 209 (Stewart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. State, 256 S.W.3d 209, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 894, 2008 WL 2572541 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

George Stewart appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for ineffective assistance of counsel, following an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the *210 briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Jones
256 S.W.3d 209 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 S.W.3d 209, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 894, 2008 WL 2572541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-state-moctapp-2008.