Stewart v. State
Opinion
ORDER
George Stewart appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for ineffective assistance of counsel, following an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the *210 briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
256 S.W.3d 209 (Stewart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.