State v. Jay
This text of 2011 Ohio 5161 (State v. Jay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Jay, 130 Ohio St.3d 239, 2011-Ohio-5161.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. JAY, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Jay, 130 Ohio St.3d 239, 2011-Ohio-5161.] Cause remanded to the court of appeals for application of State v. Dunlap. (No. 2009-1915—Submitted September 21, 2011—Decided October 12, 2011.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 91827, 2009-Ohio-4364. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of State v. Dunlap, 129 Ohio St.3d 461, 2011-Ohio-4111, 953 N.E.2d 816. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and T. Allan Regas and Lisa Williamson, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellee. Jeffrey Jay, pro se. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 Ohio 5161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jay-ohio-2011.