Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Jay

State v. Jay

920 N.E.2d 372, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1442
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jay. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Ohio 5161 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 27, 2010·No. 2009-1915·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 91827, 2009-Ohio-4364. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II; cause held for the decision in 2009-0477, State v. Dunlap, Cuyahoga App. No. 91165, 2009-Ohio-134; and briefing schedule stayed.

Lanzinger, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II only. Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jay, 920 N.E.2d 372, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1442 (Ohio 2010).

920 N.E.2d 372 (State v. Jay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Dunlap, 91165 (1-15-2009)
2009 Ohio 134 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2009)