State v. Jay

920 N.E.2d 372, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1442
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 27, 2010
Docket2009-1915
StatusPublished

This text of 920 N.E.2d 372 (State v. Jay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Jay, 920 N.E.2d 372, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1442 (Ohio 2010).

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 91827, 2009-Ohio-4364. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II; cause held for the decision in 2009-0477, State v. Dunlap, Cuyahoga App. No. 91165, 2009-Ohio-134; and briefing schedule stayed.

Lanzinger, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II only. Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Dunlap, 91165 (1-15-2009)
2009 Ohio 134 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
920 N.E.2d 372, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jay-ohio-2010.