State v. Jay
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Jay, 130 Ohio St.3d 239, 2011-Ohio-5161.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. JAY, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Jay, 130 Ohio St.3d 239, 2011-Ohio-5161.] Cause remanded to the court of appeals for application of State v. Dunlap. (No. 2009-1915—Submitted September 21, 2011—Decided October 12, 2011.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 91827, 2009-Ohio-4364. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of State v. Dunlap, 129 Ohio St.3d 461, 2011-Ohio-4111, 953 N.E.2d 816. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and T. Allan Regas and Lisa Williamson, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellee. Jeffrey Jay, pro se. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2011 Ohio 5161 (State v. Jay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.