State v. Hamilton

227 S.W.3d 529, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 973, 2007 WL 1814387
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 26, 2007·No. ED 88038·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Willie Hamilton (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s sentence and judgment imposed after a jury convicted Defendant, a prior offender under Section 558.016 RSMo Cum.Supp.2006, of two counts of first degree robbery in violation of Section 569.020 RSMo 2000, 1 and two counts of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015, and the trial court imposed concurrent sentences of twelve years for each of the robbery convictions and three years for each of the armed criminal action convictions.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent statutory citations are to RSMo 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hamilton, 227 S.W.3d 529, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 973, 2007 WL 1814387 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

227 S.W.3d 529 (State v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Mosley
227 S.W.3d 529 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)