State v. Mosley

227 S.W.3d 529, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 937, 2007 WL 1813598
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 26, 2007·No. WD 66395·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Arvazena Mosley challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support her conviction for kidnapping. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the conviction. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Mosley, 227 S.W.3d 529, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 937, 2007 WL 1813598 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

227 S.W.3d 529 (State v. Mosley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hamilton
227 S.W.3d 529 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)