State v. Hamilton

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hamilton

212 S.W.3d 171, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 118, 2007 WL 148818

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 23, 2007

DocketED 87627

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 212 S.W.3d 171 (State v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hamilton, 212 S.W.3d 171, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 118, 2007 WL 148818 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Hamilton (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting Appellant of forcible rape, forcible sodomy and kidnapping. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not plainly err. State v. Bourrage, 175 S.W.3d 698, 701 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Hamilton (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting Appellant of forcible rape, forcible sodomy and kidnapping. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not plainly err. State v. Bourrage, 175 S.W.3d 698, 701 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 S.W.3d 171, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 118, 2007 WL 148818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hamilton-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack