State v. Hamilton

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hamilton

155 S.W.3d 793, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 126, 2005 WL 147423

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 25, 2005

DocketED 83596

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 155 S.W.3d 793 (State v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hamilton, 155 S.W.3d 793, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 126, 2005 WL 147423 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Willie Hamilton (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of attempted statutory sodomy in the first degree in violation of Section 564.011 RSMo 2000.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI