State v. . Goldston

158 S.E. 926, 201 N.C. 89, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 192
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 15, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 158 S.E. 926 (State v. . Goldston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Goldston, 158 S.E. 926, 201 N.C. 89, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 192 (N.C. 1931).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

At tbe January Term, 1931, Cbatbam Superior Court, tbe defendant herein, Ben Goldston, was tried upon an indictment charging him with tbe murder of one Jobn Headen, .which resulted in a conviction and sentence of death. Tbe prisoner gave notice of appeal to tbe Supreme Court, but tbis has not been prosecuted as required by tbe rules, albeit be was allowed to appeal in forma pauperis, and was given sixty days from 17 January within which to make out and serve statement of case on appeal, and tbe solicitor was allowed thirty days thereafter to prepare and file exceptions or countercase.

*90 Application for certiorari was filed with the clerk of the Supreme Court 19 February, which was not resisted by the Attorney-General. Nothing was done in behalf of the prisoner, however, until 5 June, when his statement of case on appeal, without being served on the solicitor, as the time had expired for this (S. v. Humphrey, 186 N. C., 533, 120 S. E., 85), was filed in the oifice of the clerk of the Superior Court of Chatham County, and forwarded by him to the clerk of the Supreme Court as the only return he could make to the writ of certiorari. In the meantime, 19 May, the Attorney-General had lodged a motion to dismiss the appeal.

Notwithstanding the prisoner’s statement of case on appeal is subject to a plea of "nul tiel record,” we have examined it and find no reversible error appearing therein or on the face of the record proper. S. v. Massey, 199 N. C., 601.

Judgment affirmed. Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Scriven
59 S.E.2d 428 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
State v. Daniels
57 S.E.2d 653 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
State v. . Little
41 S.E.2d 833 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1947)
State v. . Nelson
39 S.E.2d 391 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)
State v. . Hopkins
7 S.E.2d 566 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
State v. . Mitchell
5 S.E.2d 723 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)
State v. . Dingle
183 S.E. 376 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
State v. . McLeod
182 S.E. 713 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
State v. . Allen
182 S.E. 140 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
State v. . Dunlap
181 S.E. 275 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
State v. . Williams
180 S.E. 663 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
State v. . Sentell
179 S.E. 456 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
State v. . Watson
179 S.E. 455 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
State v. . Etheridge
178 S.E. 556 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
State v. . Brown
175 S.E. 116 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
State v. . Hamlet
174 S.E. 451 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
State v. . Edney
164 S.E. 23 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 S.E. 926, 201 N.C. 89, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-goldston-nc-1931.