State v. . Hamlet
This text of 174 S.E. 451 (State v. . Hamlet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At the January Term, 1934, Duplin Superior Court, tbe defendant herein, James Dallas Hamlet, alias James Dallas Teachey, was tried upon an indictment charging him with burglary in the first degree, C. S., 4232, which resulted in a conviction and sentence of death. From the judgment thus entered, the prisoner gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court, and was allowed thirty days within which to make out and serve statement of case on appeal, and the solicitor was given thirty days thereafter to prepare and file exceptions or countercase, but nothing has been done towards perfecting the appeal. No bond was required. S. v. Stafford, 203 N. C., 601, 166 S. E., 734.
The prisoner having failed to prosecute his appeal, or to comply with the rules governing such procedure, the motion of the Attorney-General to docket and dismiss must be allowed (S. v. Johnson, 205 N. C., 610; S. v. Rector, 203 N. C., 9, 164 S. E., 339), but this we do only after an examination of the record to see that no error appears on the face thereof, as the life of the prisoner is involved. S. v. Goldston, 201 N. C., 89, 158 S. E., 926; S. v. Ward, 180 N. C., 693, 104 S. E., 531.
No error appears on the face of the record. S. v. Edney, 202 N. C., 706, 164 S. E., 23.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 S.E. 451, 206 N.C. 568, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hamlet-nc-1934.