State v. . Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Williams

180 S.E. 663, 208 N.C. 352, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 415

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedJune 26, 1935

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 180 S.E. 663 (State v. . Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Williams, 180 S.E. 663, 208 N.C. 352, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 415 (N.C. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

At the January Term, 1935, Columbus Superior Court, the defendant herein, Taft "Williams, alias William Taft Williamson, was tried upon indictment charging him with the murder of one Blanch Williams, which resulted in a conviction of murder in the first degree and sentence of death. From the judgment thus entered the defendant gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court, and was allowed thirty days within which to make out and serve statement of case on appeal. The clerk certifies that nothing has been done towards perfecting the appeal, and the time for serving statement of case has expired. S. v. Brown, 206 N. C., 747, 175 S. E., 116. No bond was required, as the defendant was granted the privilege of appealing in forma pau-peris. S. v. Stafford, 203 N. C., 601, 166 S. E., 734.

The prisoner, having failed to make out and serve statement of case on appeal within the time fixed, has lost his right to prosecute the appeal, and the motion of the Attorney-General to docket and dismiss must be allowed. S. v. Johnson, 205 N. C., 610, 172 S. E., 219. It is customary, however, in capital cases, where the life of the prisoner is involved, to examine the record to see that no error appears upon its face. *353 S. v. Goldston, 201 N. C., 89, 158 S. E., 926. Tbis we have done in tbe instant case without discovering any error on tbe face of tbe record. S. v. Hamlet, 206 N. C., 568, 174 S. E., 451.

Tbe motion of tbe Attorney-General must be allowed. S. v. Watson, ante, 70.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stacy, C. J.

At the January Term, 1935, Columbus Superior Court, the defendant herein, Taft "Williams, alias William Taft Williamson, was tried upon indictment charging him with the murder of one Blanch Williams, which resulted in a conviction of murder in the first degree and sentence of death. From the judgment thus entered the defendant gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court, and was allowed thirty days within which to make out and serve statement of case on appeal. The clerk certifies that nothing has been done towards perfecting the appeal, and the time for serving statement of case has expired. S. v. Brown, 206 N. C., 747, 175 S. E., 116. No bond was required, as the defendant was granted the privilege of appealing in forma pau-peris. S. v. Stafford, 203 N. C., 601, 166 S. E., 734.

The prisoner, having failed to make out and serve statement of case on appeal within the time fixed, has lost his right to prosecute the appeal, and the motion of the Attorney-General to docket and dismiss must be allowed. S. v. Johnson, 205 N. C., 610, 172 S. E., 219. It is customary, however, in capital cases, where the life of the prisoner is involved, to examine the record to see that no error appears upon its face. *353 S. v. Goldston, 201 N. C., 89, 158 S. E., 926. Tbis we have done in tbe instant case without discovering any error on tbe face of tbe record. S. v. Hamlet, 206 N. C., 568, 174 S. E., 451.

Tbe motion of tbe Attorney-General must be allowed. S. v. Watson, ante, 70.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 S.E. 663, 208 N.C. 352, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-williams-nc-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack